Advertisement

Rust vs Go

The new guard of systems programming.

Debate Mode

"C++ ruled for decades. Now, two contenders have risen. Go (Google) prioritizes simplicity and concurrency. Rust (Mozilla) prioritizes memory safety and zero-cost abstractions. Which one powers the future?"

Rustacean

Safety First

Gopher

Simplicity First
B
Simplicity

I can teach a junior dev Go in a weekend. The syntax is small. No generics (historically), no complex lifetime annotations. It's built for productivity and large teams.

A
Memory Safety

But at what cost? Garbage Collection. That's a pause in your program. Rust guarantees memory safety at compile time. No GC pauses. Perfect for real-time systems, embedded devices, and game engines.

B
Concurrency

Goroutines are magic. You can spawn millions of lightweight threads. Writing a highly concurrent network server in Go is trivial. Rust's 'async/await' is powerful but complex to wrap your head around.

A
Correctness

If it compiles, it works. The Borrow Checker prevents data races entirely. In Go, you can still have race conditions if you aren't careful. Rust forces you to write correct code.

B

The compile times though! I can compile my entire Go microservice in seconds. Rust takes minutes. Developer velocity matters.

A

I'd rather wait for the compiler than wake up at 3 AM for a segfault in production. Rust is the most loved language for 7 years running for a reason.

The Verdict

Use Go for network services, cloud-native microservices, and tools where development speed and easy concurrency are paramount. Use Rust for system-level programming, high-performance computing, WebAssembly, or anywhere you need C++ performance with memory safety guarantees.

Go for Services, Rust for Systems
Advertisement